Onrise Featured in The Athletic: Brandon Clarke & Kratom Scrutiny in Sports

Onrise and Learfield partner to bring comprehensive mental health care to college athletics

Back to Library Article

Injury, Identity & Mental Health: Supporting Athletes Through Career Transitions

An article exploring the psychological impact of injury and retirement on athlete identity, with evidence-based recommendations for athletic support staff.

June 18, 2025

Injury, Identity & Mental Health: Supporting Athletes Through Career Transitions

For many athletes, sport is not simply something they do — it is something they are. From early childhood through adolescence and into adulthood, the identity of “athlete” becomes woven into how a person understands themselves, relates to others, and finds meaning in daily life. Training schedules structure time. Teammates provide community. Performance becomes a measure of self-worth. This fusion is not accidental. It is the product of years of repetition, sacrifice, and cultural reinforcement from coaches, families, and institutions that celebrate athletic achievement above almost everything else.

When that identity is suddenly threatened — whether through injury, deselection, retirement, or the slow recognition that a career is ending — the psychological impact can be profound and frequently underestimated by the people around the athlete.

Understanding why this matters begins with recognising what psychologists call athletic identity foreclosure. Athletes who invest heavily in a single role, particularly from a young age, often do so at the cost of exploring other identities, interests, and capabilities. Research consistently shows that high athletic identity is a protective factor during competition — it drives commitment, resilience, and focus — but becomes a vulnerability when sport is no longer available. The stronger the fusion, the harder the rupture.

A serious injury or forced career transition does not just remove a job. It removes a framework for living. Athletes frequently describe the experience in terms that mirror bereavement: a sudden loss of structure, purpose, social belonging, physical identity, and future. It is worth taking that grief metaphor seriously. Many athletes move through recognisable stages — shock and disbelief, anger, bargaining (“if I can just come back from this”), depression, and eventual adaptation — though these stages are rarely linear and vary considerably between individuals. Some athletes oscillate between them. Others get stuck. A small but significant proportion never fully resolve the transition without professional support.

The mental health risks during this period are specific and worth naming clearly. Depression is common, particularly in the weeks following injury confirmation or retirement announcement when the initial adrenaline of crisis fades and the reality of absence sets in. Anxiety often follows — about the future, about physical capability, about who they are without the structure sport provides. Loss of purpose is perhaps the most insidious risk because it is slower and less visible than acute distress. Athletes may describe feeling flat, unmotivated, or hollow without being able to explain why. Disordered eating and substance use are also elevated risks during transition, particularly when the body has been central to identity and is now changing outside the athlete’s control.

For support staff — coaches, physiotherapists, sport psychologists, strength and conditioning coaches, and welfare officers — the window around injury and transition is a critical one. The instinct is often to focus on physical recovery or practical next steps, and while those matter, the psychological dimension needs equal attention. Checking in meaningfully, rather than transactionally, makes a difference. Asking not just “how is the rehab going?” but “how are you doing with all of this?” signals that the whole person is being seen. Maintaining connection to the training environment during injury — where appropriate and wanted — can help an athlete feel less exiled from their identity and community during recovery.

Normalising the emotional response is equally important. Athletes are often conditioned to suppress vulnerability, and many will interpret their psychological distress as weakness rather than as a rational response to genuine loss. Support staff who can name what is happening — “it makes complete sense that you’re grieving this” — reduce shame and create space for honest conversation. Referral to a sport psychologist or clinical mental health professional should be framed not as a last resort but as a standard part of the support process.

Perhaps the most meaningful long-term work is helping athletes begin building identity beyond sport before the transition fully arrives. This is easier said than done, particularly with younger athletes in high-performance environments where everything is oriented toward the next competition. But even small interventions matter: encouraging engagement with education, creative interests, community roles, or relationships outside the sporting world. Career planning support that starts early rather than late gives athletes more agency and more to stand on when their athletic chapter closes.

A healthy transition does not require an athlete to forget or minimise what sport meant to them. That would be both unrealistic and unnecessary. What it looks like, at its best, is an athlete who can hold the significance of their sporting identity while genuinely expanding their sense of self — who finds that the discipline, resilience, and commitment they built in sport translate into new domains, and who can say, eventually, that sport was something they did rather than everything they were.

Getting there rarely happens alone. It happens through consistent, skilled, humane support from the people around the athlete during one of the most vulnerable periods of their life.

Want to learn how Onrise supports your athletes?

Back to Library